➤ Key Highlights
Greystar will pay $24 million to resolve allegations of deceptive “junk fee” advertising.
Regulators accused the company of advertising rents without mandatory fees, misleading tenants.
Settlement requires full monthly pricing disclosure upfront, before applications or payments.
Greystar must overhaul its advertising, reporting, and record-keeping processes.
This is one of the largest federal enforcement actions ever targeting hidden rental costs.
Regulators are no longer treating deceptive rent pricing as a nuisance — it’s becoming a federal priority. The scale of this settlement signals a shift: transparency is now enforceable, not optional. Multifamily operators who rely on fee stacking to protect margins are moving into dangerous territory. Compliance is evolving into a competitive risk factor.
⚠️ Why it matters now
This moves the industry closer to true-in-price leasing, similar to all-in airfare pricing.
Operators who depend on ancillary fees for NOI padding will feel pressure.
Underwriting models that quietly assume revenue from mandatory “program fees” could face revisions.
More importantly, this widens regulatory exposure across the entire apartment sector — especially national managers with templated leasing systems.
Stop Reading Headlines
Start Understanding the Market
WHAT’S NEXT
ore states to follow Colorado’s lead with similar enforcement.
Institutional operators to standardize all-in rent displays to avoid federal risk.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys to target smaller operators who copy big-brand fee models.
Lenders to begin asking about fee structure compliance during underwriting.
The risk is no longer reputational — it’s financial and systemic.
➤ TAKEAWAY
If your pro forma depends on fees tenants don’t see upfront, your model just became a liability.
